Law Offices of Daniel R. Rosen

Dan Rosen is a Denver personal injury lawyer with over 25 years of experience. I have helped tens of thousands of Colorado residents and Denverites get the compensation they deserve. While my team is wonderful and dedicated, I personally handle every case. Federal law does not govern liability for dog bites. Instead, it is a patchwork of local, state, and county regulations. According to Colorado, a dog owner is strictly liable for injuries caused by their dog when the injury is serious. In this case, the dog owner is expected to pay the full amount of damages. However, the owner will be responsible for all damages, not just severe ones. Injuries that are less severe may also result in liability. Under the "one bite" rule, a dog owner may be held responsible for severe bodily injuries and a little more than an injury that is not serious. A dog owner does not have to comply with the one bite rule if their dog has bitten someone in the following ways. The plaintiff in the case must establish that the owner knew of the viciousness or escape of the dog. Under this common law principle, a dog owner is not strictly liable for an injury caused by his or her dog, or their owner's, unless they knew or should have known of the dog's vicious or violent tendencies. The plaintiff must prove that the dog had previously bitten someone before the incident and the defendant knew about this.

Client reviews demonstrate a high level of satisfaction with the Law Offices of Daniel Rosen. Daniel and his team, including Tracie Finn and Lucy, have been recommended often for their professionalism, knowledge, and responsiveness. Clients note how hands-on and thorough the team was, with many sharing that the team was communicative and methodical through each step. Importantly, many reviews hailed the settlement's value, saying it covered more than just medical bills and vehicle repair costs. Most clients ended their reviews by stating that the firm should be at the top of the list for those needing help. There is a general consensus that the firm is an excellent and reliable option. More importantly, the reviews also point out that the firm is empathetic and is interested in helping their clients navigate the legal process. Overall, the bulk of the reviewers would recommend the firm, especially in cases where their insurance company or claimant refuses to offer the needed compensation.