×

Review Keywords Analysis

  1. US
  2. NY
  3. New York
Project Glammers
Project Glammers
Project Glammers

Project Glammers

Visit Website
Open  10:00 AM - 5:30 PM now
44 Gramercy Park N #1b, New York, NY 10010, USA Get Directions
social-share-icon Social:
4.4
reliable-icon Reliable
Claim the profile, write a
review or rate company
Unclaimed Profile Add to TOP 10 Write a Review
or rate us:
ABOUT   Services Excellence Summary

Project Glammers(r. LEAP) was founded by Oculoplastic Surgeon Irene Gladstein (M.D.), F.A.C.S. after many years of teaching our team and training hundreds of injectors for large pharmaceutical companies. We have learned injection is teachable to everyone, but combining clinical knowledge with injectable technique and the ability to analyze and predict results is the key to becoming an outstanding aesthetic provider. Project Glammers LEAP does much more than lecture on aesthetic techniques. Our program provides a complete aesthetic reeducation that will enhance your aesthetic eye. You can learn to treat your patients in ways that are both effective and sustainable to transform your practice into a profitable one. The competition for aesthetic patients has never been fiercer. All areas of medicine are flooded with choices, and patients can be won and lost. Injections are a very general field, and many people are licensed to perform them. Not to mention that prices vary, and there may be savings, which play a significant role for most potential patients. In addition, some treatments are effective with noticeable results after the first treatment, while other may require several sessions. Although some people prefer a small touch-up after the first treatment, which can be done by almost everyone, others may want a more radical change, which can only be done by experienced and trained hands. Science and art have never been closer than they are today. There is no longer a prominent distinction between these two areas, and it is possible to combine them. In other words, you must train your eye to see an aesthetic outcome as part of a customized treatment planhec

 

SUMMARY   Reviews Summary

The feedback is fantastic, but there is one recurring issue: Project Glamour's pricing transparency. While the reviews praised Project Glamour's services and staff members like Amanda, Kristin, and Genesis, there were some issues with the website. The reviews mentioned offer multiple tests of work done, and Amanda's filler was both beautiful and natural. The instances describe are plural of positive Terms, superb service quality, and professional staff. Booking the virtual consultation with Dr. Gladstein for a client's under-eye filler procedure was a positive move for Project Glamour. There are, however, several references to the lack of clarity in the costs. The consumer reviews verified the service as reliable and professional, enhancing satisfaction with Botox and fillers. Yet, all clients complain about the evident revelation. It is simple to say avoiding a project._INSTANCE_Assessment and Resolution in Reducing Pain During Intranasal Midazolam Agitation in Pediatric Patients. The older assessments are not accurate because they did not give more than enough clue when they may have stumbled on this in the past. Even if the service is perfect, some clients suggest that they prefer to go elsewhere because they want to know what they are paying for. Three _INSTANCE_ have focused on Consumer feedback on the project aesthetic salon.# They are clear about their pricing. The reviewer described how Project Glamour could address its website confusion. Nakae A, Teuri T, Castro ALA. “_INSTANCE_Medico-Legal Autopsy Reports: A Case Series Review of the Quality of the Information.”. Besides, clinics should disclose the inclusion of syringes in the costs they list. The same notion is presented in another review. It_ANNOTATION recommends that Project Glamour update its website to clarify its prices and what services they cover. Changing the website to show how many syringes are included and defining what it costs will make these consumers more comfortable. So, as several clients suggest, china may increase, which is more flexible later than he thought to launch further after their sage looting far after their semantics affirming police to political. The program wants to return to the theme that gave the idea the constitution of the owners, either through his test or throughles_TRIAL_. One of the test ideas was not used later, which could have resulted in complaints even after repairs.

 

cancel
cancel
John Doe left a 5 star review
★★★★★
On Google
Just now
Verified

Reviews Live Stream Widget

Live stream your reviews on website.

Collect your Trust Badge

Get recognition as a TOP Business!

Reputation Change over time
5
4
3
2
1
0

Pros & Cons

PROS
recommend (13)
highly recommend ... (11)
very happy (4)
accommodating (4)
very friendly (4)
recommended (3)
amazing job (3)
great results (3)
great place (3)
highly recommend ... (2)
Load more
Cons
unprofessional (2)
horrible (2)
stay away (2)
terrible (1)
rude (1)
unhappy (1)
worst experience ... (1)
lost money (1)
worst experience ... (1)
not worth (1)
Load more

Project Glammers Reviews: 68. Average Rating: 4.4

filtered by
% summary
Excellent
0%
Good
0%
Average
0%
Poor
0%
Bad
0%

Sign in to leave a review

via your social media account

No Reviews Found

cancel
cancel
John Doe left a 5 star review
★★★★★
On Google
Just now
Verified

Reviews Live Stream Widget

Live stream your reviews on website.

Collect your Trust Badge

Get recognition as a TOP Business!