Howard Levitt | Toronto Employment Lawyers | Levitt LLP

Client Feedback Review: One customer complained about not knowing the Levitt LLP fees. Although the firm seemed predatory and did not disclose any costs, this concerned client was eager to know what working together would involve before the $650 or $1650 salary. They decided to move on after finding published articles about the company's historical abuse to its workers.2. Advice from Robert Taylor was invaluable as he helped navigate a multifaceted negotiation to a positive end.3. Puneet and Levitt LLP helped get the job done in a competent, professional, and timely manner. They provided exceptional guidance and support.4. Mr. Howard Levitt earned this glowing accolade due to his concern as a personal friend. The client described his care as involving problem-solving, listening, and divesting personal time in the long run.5. Steve Gillman, a Levitt LLP lawyer, actively involved a client in their case. He was responsive and compassionate even in a difficult phase, which led to a successful resolution; the client received a favorable outcome. This review was also useful as it highlighted the lawyer's availability and commitment. Every question was answered, all steps were clear, and a sense of stability was created. Without the support from Steve, life would be painful. This review specifically highlights the client's stress during the period and how legal support changed their life, proving Levitt LLP's commitment to legal emergencies.6. Jeff Vandespyker was great during an extensive and challenging time and deserves a recommendation. Client summaries offer insights into how lawyers help solve tough cases, supporting the boardroom's operations. These reviews create trust in law firms that they can manage and resolve legal disputes.7. Levitt LLP employed Lavan Narenthiran, a commendable advocate, during the last employment dispute. His firm commitment to the case ensured the legal issue was addressed within the required time frame, which reduced the client's mental stress. This feedback points out the law firm's commitment to legal deadlines and how legal boards mitigate such emergencies.8. The above client was not satisfied with the legal services, but the feedback would hint to the firm that it mismanaged and overcharged its clients due to communication gaps.9. This remark was used to evaluate whether the law firm met the client's contractual needs. Steve acted professionally and ensured that the client's rights were protected, allowing them to receive the desired remedy. The feedback shows the lawyer's level of commitment and responsiveness in legal emergencies, helping firms improve their legal boards.10. Puneet Tiwari was exceptional, displaying competence and experience during the settlement deliberations. His understanding of the settlement process and its enhancement during the negotiation shows the need to manage emerging legal risks. This feedback provides practical insights that help law firms manage legal disputes.11. The review indicated the firm's ineffective communication with a client, resulting in poor performance. The client never received the services they had contracted for, according to the feedback, which shows inadequate communication, leading to the need for legal platforms to manage their legal boardrooms.12. The firm met the client's compensation expectations, proving its successful management of contractual negotiations. The feedback hints that the firm excelled in managing emerging legal risks and should be recommended for legal boards. The comment also notes that the lawyer's "excellence" in my interactions with them was worthy of recommendation.13. The client provided the feedback to assess the lawyer's legal expertise and response to legal emergencies. This feedback provides practical insights regarding legal consultations and actions that help improve legal boards in a given jurisdiction. The firm's ability to assess the legal dispute and provide the client with the desired results was crucial, prompting the client to recommend the firm.14. The above feedback was valuable in assessing the firm's effectiveness in handling legal emergencies. This feedback was used to deduce the law firm's commitment to legal emergencies and legal expertise in contractual counseling using a legal board evaluation. Howard Levitt and his team showed the client their value and understanding during their legal dispute, prompting the client to recommend their services.15. This feedback helped assess the lawyer's competence in managing legal emergencies. This feedback suggests that the lawyer's understanding and commitment to legal emergencies help meet the client's contractual needs, allowing them to recommend legal boards. The comment also explains why the lawyer was competent and employed.