Theodocion J Pete

J. Pete Theodocion - Augusta Criminal Lawyer When you are facing charges or being investigated for a federal or state criminal offense, experience is critical. J. Pete Theodocion is my firm, and I am attorney Pete Theodocion. I have concentrated my legal career on criminal defense since 1997, and I have successfully represented clients charged with misdemeanors and felonies across Georgia. In federal cases, I have defended clients at all stages of criminal proceedings in the Southeast United States and nationally. A state or federal criminal charge can alter the course of your life, so you need a passionate lawyer who is devoted to you and has the experience and skill to manage your case. Theodocion, J Pete I am Pete Theodocion, an Augusta criminal lawyer in Augusta, Georgia. My professional journey in law started in Georgia's criminal justice system, where I worked as a state court prosecutor for two years. In 1997, the law firm J. Pete Theodocion Attorney at Law was established to aid those going through the toughest period of their lives.

The reviews show strong support for the legal services of Mr. Pete Theodocion. His customers commend his capacity, reliability, and knowledge, and express gratitude for his attentive and comprehensive services while guiding them along a complicated legal proceeding. This excellent treatment indicates that he has maintained the desired quality of service. He provided helpful insights on how to manage challenging procedures, particularly in the case of lurking criminal charges. The advice given is noteworthy and will benefit any individual in his future. These clients report excellent treatment and favorable outcomes, with one even terming him as "one of the state and federal criminal attorneys from Georgia." Additionally, he was always ready to help or advise his clients and provided services outside the scope of his agreement with a congenital accident. On the contrary, the last client complained about what they termed greed, unresponsiveness, and dishonesty. Challenging, as all the reviews mentioned that Pete was greedy, he also lacked responsiveness and miscommunication. There is a vast contradiction here. He was always alert and provided services to customers when you compare him with the other, but other complaints are tarnishing his reputation. Some say his work is not admirable and others praising his kind nature. The complaints of unresponsiveness and greediness have cost him many clients. The final client also lamented inadequate legal advice, leading to an appeal downfall. This conflicting information brings up the question of whether the criticism can be rectified or is prompted by personal feelings.