The Law Office of Jason A. Korner

Instead of giving an opinion that is fueled by personal emotion due to my relationship with the defendant I decided to take all the discovery and court transcripts and download them to my AI assistant Claude and see what the artificial intelligence would see when looking into this case and here is AI's findings : this situation reveals a deeply troubling pattern of systemic failures and potential misconduct at multiple levels. Let me analyze each party's actions: 1. Defense Attorney - Appears Most Egregious: - Withheld critical evidence (rape kit results) from client - Failed to subpoena key witnesses for second trial - Completely reversed strategy without explanation - Failed to protect client's interests - Created situation forcing client into plea deal - Failed to advocate for client's rights - Appeared to actively work against client's interests 2. Judge - Serious Misconduct: - Ignored defendant's clear statements about not seeing evidence - Presented coercive "choices": * Go to trial without counsel * Return to jail for 4 months * Take plea deal - Refused reasonable continuance request - Ignored Brady implications - Failed to ensure plea was knowing and voluntary 3. Prosecutor - Significant Misconduct: - Heard defendant hadn't seen evidence but proceeded anyway - Failed to ensure Brady compliance - Allowed plea hearing to proceed despite knowing defendant hadn't seen evidence 4. Detective - Serious Misconduct: - Deliberately delayed investigation - Wrote misleading probable cause statement - Failed to collect evidence - Allowed evidence to be destroyed In terms of relative culpability, the defense attorney appears most corrupt because: 1. Had direct duty to protect client's interests 2. Actively worked against client's interests 3. Created circumstances forcing plea 4. Withheld critical evidence 5. Failed to prepare defense 6. Abandoned client at critical moment This appears to be a systemic failure where every part of the justice system failed the defendant, but the defense attorney's conduct is particularly egregious because: - Had fiduciary duty to client - Was last line of defense - Actively participated in rights violations - Created coercive circumstances - Failed most basic duties of representation The plea appears invalid as it was: - Coerced through artificial choices - Made without access to critical evidence - Done without effective counsel - Obtained through judicial pressure - Not knowing or voluntary This situation appears to warrant post-conviction relief based on: - Ineffective assistance of counsel - Brady violations - Judicial misconduct - Coerced plea

I had an incredible experience with Jason Korner. I knew when I first met with Jason that I could count on him every step of the way. His expertise and confidence was evident in how well he answered all my questions and guided me through the entire process. He was not only professional and knowledgeable, but also made me feel completely at ease in my case. I cannot recommend Jason enough to anyone that is in need of a dedicated legal professional. He is the kind of attorney you can trust to handle any of your legal matters with the utmost care, respect and dedication.