James B. Feldman, Attorney At Law, P.S.C.

James B. Feldman, Attorney At Law, P.S.C., has a vast practice in criminal defense as well as trial litigation in Pierce, King, Kitsap counties, and throughout the Tacoma metropolitan area. He is a juris degree holder from the University of Puget Sound School of Law. His 30-plus years of practicing have centered on defending the constitutional rights of the accused in criminal matters, from misdemeanors to other felonies and domestic violence. He has maintained a clean record with the Washington State Bar Association all this time. Over the years, his clients have seen favorable outcomes. To successfully challenge your arrest for possession, distribution, and manufacture of drugs, you must scrutinize witness statements, police methods, and their applications for warrants, as well as their evidence-gathering procedures. By carefully recalling what you experienced during and after the arrest, you may uncover defenses that were not previously apparent. The increased role of law enforcement in drug investigations due to the rise of technology has given rise to a fresh area of law. In U.S. v Jones (132, S.Ct. 949 (2012)), the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged two cases challenging warrantless searches of cell phones by law enforcement officers.

James Feldman is constantly lauded in all reviews for his vast experience, professionalism, and vigorous pledge toward his clients. He fluids explanations for even the most negligible questions. Clients also appreciate his work ethics and kind-heartedness in providing numerous options, ensuring the client's contentment. He is a highly recommended attorney who values client communication and demonstrates profound knowledge in various areas of law. Notable is his focus on ensuring the clients make informed choices and appreciate the progress of their cases. Surveillance and responsiveness are some of his credited virtues as he always ensures he provides guidance in a way that a client unlike advice. He was hired for a traffic ticket, James communication to the walls in the case, prepared the witness for the hearing and finally the judgment was ruled in favor of his client working 24/7 if necessary. His work on legal cases is mostly appreciated by clients; hence, his recommendation is still enough.